Louisiana trial court

Ford, Glenn (2007)

Court: Louisiana trial court

Counsel: Innocence Network by Sidley Austin

Position: Challenges to unsound forensic sciences should be basis for granting a new trial.

Issues: Unreliable Forensic Science

Issues: Access to Post-Conviction DNA Testing; Actual Innocence; Compensation; Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations; Eyewitness Identification; False Confessions; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Informant Testimony; New Evidence of Innocence; Other Issues; Police and Prosecutorial Misconduct; Unreliable Forensic Science

Courts: Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals; Appellate Court of Illinois; D.C. Circuit; Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, Louisiana; Georgia Supreme Court; Indiana Supreme Court; Louisiana Court of Appeals; Louisiana trial court; Mass. Supreme Judicial Court; Missouri Supreme Court; New Jersey Supreme Court; New York Court of Appeals; Ninth Circuit; North Carolina Court of Appeals; Ohio Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District; Ohio Supreme Court; Rhode Island Supreme Court; Sixth Circuit; Supreme Court of Arkansas; Supreme Court of Connecticut; Supreme Court of Louisiana; Supreme Court of New Hampshire; Supreme Ct. of PA, Eastern Dist.; Tennessee Supreme Court; Tenth Circuit; Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division; U.S. Supreme Court; Washington State Court of Appeals, Division III; Washington Supreme Court; Wisconsin Court of Appeals; Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I; Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III; Wisconsin Supreme Court